Anti-H Antibody Showing Agglutination in the Anti-Human Globulin Phase in a Korean Patient

No abstract available.

Effect of Irradiation on Microparticles in Red Blood Cell Concentrates

Changes in microparticles (MP) from red blood cell (RBC) concentrates in the context of irradiation have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate how irradiation affects the number of MPs within transfusion components. Twenty RBC concentrates, within 14 days after donation, were exposed to gamma rays (dose rate: 25 cGy) from a cesium-137 irradiator. Flow cytometry was used to determine the numbers of MPs derived from RBC concentrates before and 24 hr after irradiation. The mean number of MPs (±standard deviation) in RBC concentrates was 21.9×10(9)/L (±22.7×10(9)/L), and the total number of MPs ranged from 2.6×10(9)/L to 96.9×10(9)/L. The mean number of MPs increased to 22.6×10(9)/L (±31.6×10(9)/L) after irradiation. Before irradiation, the CD41-positive and CD235a-positive MPs constituted 9.5% (1.0×10(9)/L) and 2.2% (263×10(6)/L) of total MPs, respectively. After irradiation, CD41-positive MPs increased to 12.1% (1.5×10(9)/L) (P=0.014), but the CD235a-positive MPs decreased to 2.0% (214×10(6)/L) of the total MPs (P=0.369). Irradiation increases the number of CD41-positive MPs within RBC concentrates, suggesting the irradiation of RBC concentrates could be associated with thrombotic risk of circulating blood through the numerical change.

Actual Incidence of Transfusion-Related Adverse Reactions Compared with Transfusion-Related Signs or Symptoms and by Each Blood Product / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-related adverse reaction is detected based on patients' adverse signs or symptoms during or after transfusion. We analyzed the actual incidence of transfusion-related adverse reactions by investigating diagnosed cases among reported signs or symptoms, and reexamined our transfusion-related adverse reaction reporting system. METHODS: From January to June, 2015, there were 4,234 cases of transfusion and 18,191 units of blood product were used. During transfusion, patients' signs or symptoms were checked and reported by the medical team at least three times, 5 minutes after transfusion started, during transfusion, and after transfusion, using the electronic reporting system in the blood bank. A laboratory medicine doctor investigated reported signs or symptoms by reviewing patients' electronic medical records, diagnosed transfusion-related adverse reaction by textbook definition, and surveyed actual incidence. In addition, incidence of transfusion-related signs or symptoms and transfusionrelated adverse reaction by each blood product was determined. RESULTS: Out of 1,091 transfusion-related signs or symptoms, only 226 cases (20.71%) were diagnosed with transfusion-related adverse reaction. Among these, most common cases were febrile nonhemolytic reaction with incidence of 0.91%, followed by allergic reaction with 0.32%. The incidence of transfusion-related adverse reaction by each blood product was highest for leukocyte-reduced red blood cells 3.41% and apheresis platelets 2.59%. Febrile nonhemolytic reaction was mainly related to red blood cells and allergic reaction was mainly related to platelets. CONCLUSION: The actual incidence of transfusion-related adverse reaction was only 20% of transfusion-related signs or symptoms. Therefore, reforming the reporting system and transfusion-related clinical inspection and education are required.

A Case of Primary Anti-D Alloimmunization by RHD (c.1227G>A) DEL Red Blood Cell Transfusion / 대한수혈학회지

The Rh blood group D antigen is the most immunogenic of all antigens, next to ABO antigens. Anti-D immunization is clinically important since it may cause clinical problems, such as severe hemolytic transfusion reactions and hemolytic disease of the newborn. DEL is an extremely weak D variant that cannot be detected by basic serologic typing and is typed as D-negative without the absorption-elution techniques and RHD genotyping. Of the DEL phenotype, RHD (c.1227G>A) allelic variant is the most common in Korea. The DEL phenotype has been considered to carry only a few D antigens to induce anti-D immunization, but a few cases have reported that this allelic variant is capable of inducing anti-D immunization in a D-negative recipient, for which it is clinical significant. Herein, we present a case of primary anti-D alloimmunization in a RhD negative patient after receiving RHD (c.1227G>A) DEL red cell transfusion identified by serological and molecular tests, including RHD genotyping.

Evaluation of the Automated Blood Bank Instrument QWALYS-3 for Cross-Matching Tests / 대한수혈학회지

BACKGROUND: The cross-matching test is regarded as an essential pre-transfusion test. It serves an important role in confirming the ABO/Rh compatibility of transfusion and screening for possible unexpected antibodies. We evaluated cross-matching tests in QWALYS-3 (DIAGAST, Loos Cedex, France), comparing the automated process to manual tube methods. METHODS: A total of 545 crossmatching tests from 169 patients, collected from RBC concentrate transfusion orders, were performed using both QWALYS-3 and manual tube methods. All patients were follow-up tested later on with antibody identification tests to confirm the presence of unexpected antibodies in plasma. RESULTS: None of the samples were ABO/Rh incompatible. The presence of unexpected antibodies was later confirmed in 277 tests in 56 patients. Out of those 277 tests, the concordance rate between two methods was 83.8% (232/277). In 268 tests which were later confirmed with no unexpected antibodies, manual tube methods did not show any positive results while five tests were false-positive (5/268, 1.9%) only in QWALYS-3. The overall concordance rate between two methods was 90.82%, and the kappa coefficient was 0.696 (P<0.05) (n=545). CONCLUSION: The QWALYS-3 system has its merits in accuracy, precision, and lack of possible human errors, however, the automated procedure showed some disadvantages, including relatively low cost-and-time-effectiveness, less effective cold antibody detection, and difficulties in handling small quantity samples. Thus, the QWALYS-3 system has meaningful, but only a limited value in the automation of routine cross-matching tests.